Description:
Dorsal spines (total): 2; Dorsal soft rays (total):
6 - 7; Anal spines: 0; Anal soft rays: 14 - 15; Vertebrae:
44 - 46. Diagnosis: Ancharius fuscus is distinguished
from other species of Anchariidae by the following
unique characters: shorter snout, 40.1-45.8% of head
length vs. 47.1-54.3; longer maxillary barbels, reaching
to midpoint of pectoral-fin base vs. not reaching
to base of pectoral spine; pectoral spine serrated
along its entire posterior margin; vs. along distal
half only; and purplish-gray colouration vs. highly
mottled dark grey and cream, lead grey or mottled
brownish-grey. It further differs from Ancharius
griseus in having a shorter dorsal-fin spine,
14.6-22.6% of standard length vs. 22.9-24.3%; and
larger eye, 11.4-15.4% of head length vs. 9.3-10.1%.
Body shape (shape guide): fusiform / normal. Habitat:
Ancharius fuscus is restricted to the middle
to upper reaches of several river basins of the eastern
coast of Madagascar and to habitats that are not highly
degraded.Etymology:
The genus name Ancharius: ánchi (Gr.),
near, referring to its similarity to Arius
(Ariidae). The specific name fuscus: Latin
for dark or dusky, referring to “dirty dark”
(translation) colour on top and sides (light violet
on the bottom).
Common
Name:
Vaona
Synonyms:
None
Family:
Anchariidae
Distribution:
Africa:
Widely distributed along eastern-draining rivers of
Madagascar. Type Locality: Tohizona
auf Madagascar.
Size:
30.0cm. (12ins)
Temp:
-
p.H.
-
IUCN
Red List
Ancharius
fuscus has by far the widest range of any member
of the family, extending from the region of Maroansetra
in the north, where the holotype was presumably collected
(detailed locality data was not presented in original
description), to the southeastern highlands; all other
Anchariidae are known from only a single basin. However,
despite this wide range in eastern Madagascar, population
sizes/status are poorly known, and this is not a common
species anywhere throughout its range. The prior assessment
was Data deficient, however, the study of Ng and Sparks
(2005) suggests that this species should be reassessed
as Least Concern as the EOO is estimated at 63,000 km²
and there is no indication of a significant population
decline at this time, despite quite intensive fishing
in the southern part of its range. (IUCN 2016).
If you would like to contribute to the monthly
factsheets with an article, information or photos, please e-mail
me. You will of course be credited for your work.
If you would like to donate any denomination
of monies to the site just click the above link button. All proceeds
will go to running the site and hopefully to keep it going for a few
years yet.